It's been nearly a year since the Volkswagen emissions scandal erupted. Now, the European Commission is weighing what disciplinary action to take against states that didn't enforce environmental regulations well enough.
Image: picture alliance/AP Photo/M. Schreiber
Advertisement
A European Parliament committee unanimously adopted a draft report on Tuesday that looked at the shortcomings within European law and law enforcement that made it possible for the Volkswagen diesel scandal to happen.
The 41-0 vote came a day after members of the "Committee of Inquiry into Emission Measurement in the Automotive Sector" heard testimony from EU Industry Commissioner Elzbieta Bienkowska late Monday on what her office was doing to take Volkswagen to task and find out whether any other auto companies in Europe had used so-called "defeat devices" in their cars.
In prepared remarks, Bienkowska said she had called upon EU member states to investigate how defeat devices were used on their soil and asked them to report back to her. Only four states - Denmark, Britain, France and Italy - have done so thus far, to which the commissioner said she was "disappointed with where things stand."
"The data submitted by member states is incomplete and there are still many outstanding questions for which additional technical information is needed," Bienkowska continued.
The lack of urgency shown by national authorities was reflective, she said, of a "reluctance, I would say even the resistance to necessary changes." National governments had failed to enforce existing EU legislation that controls the requirements and test cycles used to measure vehicles' emissions, she added.
Bienkowska has announced that any country that is found to have turned a blind eye to emission violations would be investigated themselves for breaches of EU law and could possibly face fines.
"If they do not honor these rules, there must be consequences," the commissioner said.
Last week, German media cited anonymous sources saying the European Commission had found that Volkswagen broke consumer laws in 20 EU countries by cheating on emissions tests.
Dieselgate: A timeline
VW's emissions scandal plunged the automaker into its deepest crisis ever. It brought with it everlasting damage to VW's reputation and massive fees and penalties — not to mention compensation claims from car owners.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/J. Stratenschulte
The disaster unfolds — September 2015
About two weeks after Volkswagen admitted behind closed doors to US environmental regulators that it had installed cheating software in some 11 million of its diesel vehicles worldwide, the Environmental Protection Agency shared that information with the public. It was September 18, 2015. The ensuing crisis would eventually take a few unexpected turns.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/O. Spata
The boss must go, long live the boss — September 2015
Volkswagen's then-CEO Martin Winterkorn (above) had little choice but to step down several days after news of the scandal broke. In September 2015, he tendered his resignation, but retained his other posts within the Volkswagen Group. Winterkorn's successor was Matthias Müller. Until taking the reins at VW, Müller had been the chairman at Porsche, a VW subsidiary.
Image: picture-alliance/Sven Simon
Raiding headquarters — October 2015
Regulators in the US weren't the only ones investigating VW. Authorities in Lower Saxony, the German state in which VW is based, were also scrutinizing the company. On October 8 2015, state prosecutors raided VW's headquarters along with several other corporate locations.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/P. Steffen
Hell breaks loose — January 2016
On January 4, 2016, the US government filed a lawsuit against VW in Detroit, accusing the German automaker of fraud and violations of American climate protection regulations. The lawsuit sought up to $46 billion for violations of the Clean Air Act.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/A. Burgi
Quit or forced out? — March 2016
In March 2016, the head of VW in the US, Michael Horn, resigned. In the initial days and weeks after the scandal broke, he was the one US authorities turned to for information. He issued an official apology on behalf of the automaker, asking for the public's forgiveness.
Image: Getty Images/C. Somodevilla
Settlement — October 2016
On October 25 2016, a US judge approved a final settlement that would have VW pay $15.3 billion. In addition, affected cars would be retrofitted with better, non-deceptive hardware and software, or else VW would buy them back completely from customers.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/P. Pleul
Imitators — July 2017
When dieselgate first emerged in 2015, analysts said it was likely other car makers were also cheating tests. But it wasn't until 2017 that other companies were targeted in probes. In July, German authorities launched investigations into luxury car makers Porsche and Daimler for allegedly cheating emissions tests. Others, such as Audi and Chrysler, have also been hit by similar allegations.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/F. Kraufmann
Public still supportive — December 2017
Despite dieselgate, VW has managed to keep the emissions scandal from utterly tarnishing its image. According to several polls, between 55 to 67 percent of Germans continue to trust the automaker. In the US, polls show that roughly 50 percent still believe the German company produces worthwhile vehicles.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/C. Klose
Fuming over monkeys — January 2018
In late January, however, VW suffered another heavy blow over reports that the company experimented on monkeys and made the animals inhale diesel fumes. To make matters worse, a separate experiment that had humans inhale relatively harmless nitrogen dioxide was revealed at the same time. Some media wrongly interpreted this to mean humans were also inhaling toxic fumes.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/F. Gentsch
Canadian court demands millions — January 2020
Years after the scandal that caused Volkswagen to pay CAN$2.4 billion (US$1.83 billion), a court in Toronto order a further fine of CAN$196.5 million. Volkswagen pleaded guilty of violating in environmental laws. Prosecutor Tom Lemon noted that the fine was "26 times the highest fine ever for a Canadian environmental offence."
