As the Eurovision Song Contest finals approach, last year's winner, Ukraine's Jamala, told DW about the politics of the music spectacle. She also explained why she's worried about the future of Crimea.
Advertisement
DW: You won the competition last year and brought the Eurovision Song Contest to Kyiv. Are you satisfied with the way your country is hosting the finals?
Jamala: Of course, I am very happy. It's a celebration not only for my team and my family but for the entire country. My country is happy. Look on the streets today - they are decorated and everyone is walking around, everyone is singing. It doesn't matter what you think of the Eurovision contest, it's an honor to welcome so many guests.
Eurovision in Kyiv
04:13
In your song, titled "1944," you recalled the fate of the Crimean Tatars who were persecuted and deported under Soviet rule. Many in Moscow saw that as a provocation. What was the intention of your song?
I had to put up with a lot. There were a lot of rumors and a lot of talk. People had a sensitive reaction because the issue had been a taboo for so long. The title alone, "1944," was provocative because it brought us back to a time when the Crimean Tatars were deported. I did not change the song's title because this date is connected to my family - to my great-grandmother Nasylchan who was deported to Central Asia with her children. It shows the pain, the tragedy of an entire people.
There's a more important aspect: Why did Europe vote for me? Because today, it seems to me, that things are happening in the world that are no less terrible. People and individuals are being murdered - for no reason. That's why, it seems to me, the public in Europe reacted to my song the way it did. People felt the song on an emotional level.
Right now, the Tatars in Crimea face various sorts of discrimination since Russia annexed the Ukrainian peninsula three years ago. You are a Tatar yourself, and your parents live there. What do you hear from Crimea?
That's is a painful topic for me. My parents are there, and I am very worried about them. The Russians understand that Crimean Tatars do not agree with the occupation - the annexation - and that they will take steps against it. So it's important for the Russians that their opponents do not get a chance to speak out. That's why people there just disappear from the street, especially young people. It's very sad. I'm very worried about the future of Crimea.
Russia will not participate in this year's Eurovision Song Contest because their nominee was banned from entering Ukraine as she had previously violated Ukrainian immigration laws. Do you miss the Russian fans and artists?
No, sorry. No.
Observers have said the Kyiv 2017 European Song Contest is being overshadowed by politics that it is being overshadowed by the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. Do you share this point of view?
I find that very sad. I think no normal person wants war or conflict. But it is the case that we have a war going on in Donbass and that Crimea is occupied. What can we do? We cannot just close our eyes and pretend that nothing is happening.
Interview conducted by Christian Trippe.
10 times Eurovision turned political
It's that time of year again: Eurovision is upon us, but it isn't all about sequins and songs. Here are 10 times that politics trumped performance in the song contest.
Image: Marco Bertorello/AFP/Getty Images
Russia and Crimea supporters excluded
Russia's ban from the 2022 Eurovision was a consequence of its invasion of Ukraine. But even before that, politics also marred Ukraine's national selection this year. Alina Pash, who had first won the selection contest, was found to have traveled to Crimea from Russia in 2015 — breaking Ukraine's rules set in 2019. She pulled out, allowing runner-up Kalush Orchestra to represent the country.
Image: Marco Bertorello/AFP/Getty Images
Don't upset the neighbors
This 2017 contest, held in the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv, marked the first time that a host state banned another country's entrant. Ukrainian security services denied entry to 27-year-old, wheelchair-bound Yulia Samoylova of Russia after reports surfaced that she had toured Crimea after Russia annexed it in 2014. In response, Russia's state-owned broadcaster Channel One will not air the contest.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/M. Antipina
Lyrically political
Russia and Ukraine had their share of Eurovision drama in 2016 when Ukrainian entrant Jamala beat Russia's Sergey Lazarev. The song "1944" about Stalin’s deportation of Crimean Tatars during the World War Two was initially deemed controversial due to the contest's ban on explicit political messages. Jamala was victorious, however, with 534 points. Russia finished third, with Australia second.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/B. Pedersen
Rising against the radicals
Even though the song contest is known as a celebration of diversity, at the 2014 event in Copenhagen, the victory of Austrian drag queen Conchita Wurst (the stage persona of Tom Neuwirth) saw a backlash from numerous countries. Radical groups in Russia, Azerbaijan and Belarus all campaigned — without success — to keep the then 25-year-old from entering.
Image: AFP/Getty Images
Erdogan-vision
Citing "dissatisfaction with the rules," Turkey refused to participate in the 2013 contest. Following Conchita Wurst's victory, a Turkish MP from President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's AKP reported the country would no longer take part in the Eurovision Song Contest. Turkey had participated in the contest 34 times since its first appearance in 1975 and even won in 2004.
Image: picture alliance/AP Photo/O. Orsal
Russian disco
Georgia was disqualified from the Moscow 2009 contest over their disco-funk entry, "We Don't Wanna Put In" after the Geneva-based European Broadcasting Union (EBU) deemed the lyrics too political. As well as an apparent play on Russian President Vladimir Putin's name, Georgian female trio 3G, along with male vocalist Stephane sang of a "negative move" that was "killing the groove."
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/ITAR-TASS/D. Urbani
Singing for freedom
In 2001, Estonia became the first former-Soviet republic to win Eurovision. "We freed ourselves from the Soviet empire through song," Estonian Prime Minister Mart Laar said, following the victory in Copenhagen. "Now we will sing our way into Europe," he added, referring to the talks that led the country to join the European Union in 2004. Estonia's independence was restored in 1991.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/NORDFOTO/N. Meilvang
Geographical bias
A long-running debate in Eurovision is the apparent bloc voting by neighboring countries. Late UK presenter Terry Wogan famously stepped down from commentating Eurovision in 2008, saying it was "no longer a music contest." Some of the main perpetrators are Cyprus and Greece, Scandinavia, the Balkan states and the former Soviet bloc. The change in voting in 2016 aimed to minimize geographical bias.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/K. Okten
Tongue-tied Belgians
Language has long been a fundamental flaw at the heart of Belgium's ongoing existential Eurovision crisis. For years, in a bid to keep the peace at home, Belgium has alternated between sending an entry to sing either in Flemish or French. Back in 2003, however, the Belgians avoided any linguistic woes with their entry "Sanomi," which was sung by the band Urban Trad in a fictional language.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/U. Perrey
Austria takes a stand
In 1969, Austria took a political stance against Spain and withdrew from Eurovision. The country refused to take part in Madrid to show its opposition to the Franco regime. Spanish General Francisco Franco ruled over Spain as a military dictator for 39 years from 1936 until his death in 1975. An estimated 200,000 to 400,000 people died as a result of his human rights abuses.