The trial of three former executives from the operator of the tsunami-stricken Fukushima nuclear plant has begun. It will focus mainly on whether they were guilty of negligence before the nuclear accident.
Advertisement
Tsunehisa Katsumata, the former chairman of the Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), and his two former vice presidents Sakae Muto and Ichiro Takekuro all pleaded not guilty on Friday to charges of professional negligence relating to the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster.
The three men apologized for the disaster and the trouble it caused, but claimed they bore no criminal responsibility because it was an unforeseeable catastrophe.
"When I recall that time, I still think it was impossible to anticipate an accident like that," said Muto. "I believe I have no criminal responsibility for the accident."
The trial, which is taking place at Tokyo District Court, is expected to take more than a year. If convicted, the former executives could face up to five years in prison or a financial penalty.
Three reactors had meltdowns after a tsunami hit the Fukushima Nuclear Reactor, located around 280 kilometers (roughly 170 miles) north of Tokyo, in 2011. The surrounding region,, home to tens of thousands, was evacuated after the incident, and parts of the area affected remain uninhabitable.
The tsunami left 18,500 dead or missing, although the meltdown at the nuclear plant is not officially recorded as killing anyone. The prosecution argues, however, that 40 senior citizens who died during or after an evacuation from a hospital might not have perished without the incident.
Six years after Fukushima: Will survivors return home?
Prosecutors considered the case against the three former executives twice and dropped it both times, but a citizen's judicial panel in Japan overrode the decision.
"Since the accident, nobody has been held responsible nor has it been made clear why it happened," Ruiko Muto, who heads the group that pushed for the trial, told French news agency AFP. "Many people have suffered badly in ways that changed their lives. We want these men to realise how many people are feeling sadness and anger."
Negligence the core issue
The former executives stand accused of failing to take the necessary preventative measures to prevent such a disaster despite being aware of the risk a major tsunami could pose.
"They continued running the reactors without taking any measures whatsoever," the prosecutor said. "If the had fulfilled their safety responsibilities, the accident would have never occurred."
A report by a government panel said TEPCO simulated the impact of a tsunami on the plant in 2008 and concluded that a wave of 15.7 meters (51.5 feet) could hit the plant if an earthquake of 8.3 magnitude occurred. TEPCO executives allegedly ignored the internal study.
The undersea earthquake that caused the tsunami was recorded at a magnitude of 9.0, causing a 14-meter wave to swamp the reactor's cooling system.
TEPCO has said it could have been more proactive in taking safety measures, but a tsunami of that magnitude could not be anticipated.
dv/msh (AFP, AP)
Does nuclear power have a future?
On April 26, 1986, the Chernobyl disaster released radiation across Ukraine, Russia and into Europe. It was turning point for the anti-nuclear movement. Now, 31 years later, is nuclear power becoming a thing of the past?
Image: Kerry Skyring
Deadly disaster
The worst nuclear disaster of all time, the explosion at Chernobyl nuclear plant in Ukraine released massive amounts of radiation into the atmosphere. Areas close to the plant - in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia - were heavily contaminated. Heightened levels of radiation were also measured across most of Europe. The "exclusion zone" around Chernobyl remains off-limits to human habitation today.
Image: picture-alliance/ dpa
It happens again
After a magnitude-9 earthquake and consequent tsunami, three nuclear reactors at Fukushima power plant in Japan went into meltdown in March 2011. There were also four hydrogen explosions. The accident released 500 times as much radioactive cesium-137 as the nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945. The clean-up is expected to take decades.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa
Sickening impact
After Chernobyl, thousands of people developed cancer. In Japan too, the heavily contaminated region of Fukushima, where 200,000 people lost their homes, saw cases of the disease escalate. The number of children with thyroid cancer there is 20 times higher than other regions.
Image: Reuters
Rallying against nuclear power
Chernobyl fueled public opposition to nuclear power, particularly in Europe. The same happened after Fukushima. Before the Japanese disaster, the country relied on nuclear for 30 percent of its power. That has fallen to 1 percent. The government wants to continue producing nuclear power and plans to reinstall some reactors. But affected regions have successfully pushed back those plans.
Image: REUTERS
Nuclear industry in crisis
Today, the nuclear power sector is deep in economic crisis. In Japan, the United States and France, nuclear power plants run at a loss, and construction projects for new reactors have been postponed.
Image: Reuters
New-build set-backs
France had high hopes for its newest nuclear reactors - called pressurized water reactors (PWRs). This technology was supposed to be safe, and the Flamanville power plant was due to be switched on in 2012. Due to security issues, that's been pushed back to 2018 at the earliest. The project will cost more than 10 billion euros - three times the original budget.
Image: Getty Images/AFP/C. Triballeau
Great Britain plans new reactors
For years, the UK has been planning to build two new PWR reactors at Hinkley Point. Costs are estimated at 33 billion euros and groundbreaking is slated for 2019. But doubts are growing over its economic viability. The electricity it produces will be much pricier than solar or wind power, and will need subsidies to compete in the market.
Image: Getty Images/J. Tallis
Aging reactors up for grabs
Nuclear power plants used to be lucrative. But now, many are old and frail. Repair costs often mean they cannot turn a profit. Swiss energy corporation Alpiq recently tried to give away two of its old plants, 33 and 38 years old, to French energy company EDF - which declined the offer.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/P. Seeger
Disasters abroad prompt German phase-out
Three decades ago, the Chernobyl disaster galvanized Germany's anti-nuclear movement, which is often cited as the roots of the country's energy transition. In 2002, Germany passed a law that would have seen the last reactor shut down in 2022. The plan was later scrapped by Angela Merkel's government. But after Fukushima, Merkel quickly reversed her decision and the phase-out was back on track.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/D. Ebener
Switching them off
So far, nine of Germany's reactors have gone offline, with eight more to follow by 2022. To finance the costs of nuclear waste disposal, plant operators must pay 23.6 billion euros into a federal fund. The operators themselves are responsible for the similarly costly process of dismantling the plants, which will take decades to complete.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/D. Ebener
Growing fear of accidents
Across the EU and Switzerland 132 nuclear reactors are still online. They were designed to operate for 30 to 35 years - their average age is now 32 years. Malfunctions and security issues are frequently detected and protestors are increasingly calling for plants to be shut down.
Image: DW/G. Rueter
China pushes on with nuclear
No new nuclear power plants have been built in the EU, Japan or Russia since the Fukushima disaster in 2011. China remains committed to nuclear, partly to replace coal-based power. But the country is also upping investment in wind and solar.