Although part Jewish, Hildebrand Gurlitt loved the Modern art the Nazis banned. Nevertheless, he found himself as Hitler's art dealer, responsible for selling masterpieces the Nazis had stolen from Jews.
Advertisement
German art dealer Hildebrand Gurlitt liked modern art. But after the Nazis rose to power and banned art they considered "degenerate" - mainly innovative, Modern pieces - he mixed politics with business.
The Nazis confiscated the art they condemned, or bought it at rock-bottom prices. In 1938, they recognized the financial potential of these masterpieces and, instead of simply exhibiting them in the name of propaganda, they decided to sell them abroad and fill their pockets with the revenues.
How Gurlitt decided to work for Hitler
Skilled art dealers were sought for the Nazis' newly founded business. Hildebrand Gurlitt applied for a job in what was advertised as Department IX of the Ministry for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda. He became one of four art dealers to work for the Nazi regime.
By 1944, Gurlitt had closed thousands of art deals for the Nazis and collected numerous artworks for the museum Hitler himself was planning to found in the small city of Linz on the Rhine River.
Prior to working for the Nazis, Hildebrand Gurlitt headed the König Albert Museum in Zwickau, where he planned to build up a collection of modern art. But his avant-garde taste didn't please everyone and pressure from the conservative community led to his dismissal. His subsequent position as head of the Kunstverein in Hamburg was also short-lived.
Hildebrand Gurlitt's life story is the focus of art historian Meike Hoffmann's research. Together with "Tagesspiegel" journalist Nicola Kuhn, she recently published his biography in German, titled "Hitlers Künsthändler," or "Hitler's Art Dealer."
Hoffmann told DW in an interview that it was important for her to portray the beginning of Gurlitt's development and to find out "how he got sucked in by Naziism, how he was corrupted and how he got involved in these complicated mechanisms."
Gurlitt covered up his Jewish background
One of Gurlitt's motivations was his Jewish background. His grandmother was Jewish, which qualified him as a quarter Jewish - enough to draw the scorn of the Nazis. But by working for the regime, he found "he was able to protect himself and still continue working with the artworks he had always favored," explained Hoffmann.
In the 400-page biography, Hoffmann recounts how Gurlitt worked to achieve the highest possible profit for the Nazis in his art deals. From among the confiscated works, he "picked out masterpieces because he knew that these artists had international market value and that he could distinguish himself right away by making a big profit," according to Hoffmann.
A portion of the works that had been unethically acquired by the Nazis landed in Gurlitt's personal collection. "A number of them were certainly acquired for personal reasons, but most of them are the leftovers that he was not able to sell to German museums," said the author.
After the war, in 1948, Gurlitt began working as director of the so-called Kunstvereins für die Rheinlande und Westfalen, an art collection in western Germany. Hoffmann called his work there the "Wiedergutmachung" - or compensation of the Classical Modern.
Gurlitt had contact with 'all the museums'
Hoffmann mainly conducted her research in museum archives. "Even today, nearly all of the museum archives in Germany, but also in Switzerland, France and England, contain Hildebrand Gurlitt's correspondence because he maintained such intensive contact with all the museums at the time," Hoffmann told DW. Germany's national archives also served as a source.
The main inspiration for the book, however, came when Hoffmann's colleague Andreas Hünecke acquired correspondence and documents from 1943-1944 via an online platform. "That's when I started to think about publishing something on Hildebrand Gurlitt," recalled the author.
She would spend the next few years of her life with the Gurlitt family - not only with Hildebrand, but also with his son Cornelius. In 2012, over 1,000 artworks were found in his apartment, including masterpieces by Marc Chagall, Max Liebermann, Henri Matisse and Pablo Picasso. Suspected as Nazi-looted art, many of the pieces were confiscated by the police.
It wasn't until fall 2013 that the Gurlitt case was made public. In response, the German government put together a so-called taskforce to research the provenance of the Gurlitt collection and determine how many of the artworks had been looted or misappropriated by the Nazis and whether they should be returned to their lawful heirs.
Meike Hoffmann was also a member of the taskforce, which was dissolved after two years. The result: Of 499 works with uncertain provenance, only four were determined with complete certainty to be looted art. Two additional pieces are strongly suspected of having been looted by the Nazis.
Gurlitt: An art world thriller
In November 2013, a huge collection of lost art works were discovered in the Munich apartment of Cornelius Gurlitt. One year later, new chapters are being written in the Gurlitt thriller.
Image: alexskopje/Fotolia.com
The chronology of a treasure trove
In September 2010, customs officials stop an elderly man in a train from Zurich to Munich. His name: Cornelius Gurlitt. He is carrying a suspiciously large amount of money with him. Even though that's not forbidden, border guards report him to tax officials. In 2011, a search in his Munich apartment leads to an astonishing discovery.
Image: picture alliance / AP Images
Nazi-looted art amidst trash
Among junk and expired cans of food littering the residence, the investigators discover thousands of art works which had gone missing during World War II. Behind this invaluable art collection are countless episodes of deep pain and injustice.
Image: babiradpicture
Looted art scandal of the century
The art works are presumed to have been looted by Nazis, which confiscated so-called "degenerate art" and stole works from Jewish collectors. Paintings by Pablo Picasso, Henri Matisse, Marc Chagall, Paul Klee, Max Liebermann (pictured: "Two Riders on the Beach"), as well as other modern classic paintings, make up the collection. The name Gurlitt was already notorious in Germany's art world.
Image: gemeinfrei
Confiscated, stolen, sold
Hildebrand Gurlitt, Cornelius Gurlitt's father, was an art dealer during the Nazi era. He traded "degenerate art" for the planned Führer Museum in Linz and sold paintings which had been confiscated from Jewish owners or museums abroad. After the war, he reported that his private collection and all business records had disappeared in the Dresden fire bombing of 1945.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa
Roars from a lion tamer
In 2011, his son Cornelius Gurlitt sells Max Beckmann's painting, "The Lion Tamer." A 1931 label of the Flechtheim Gallery glued on the back of the painting should have made the art world suspicious. This Jewish art dealer had fled Germany in 1933, leaving many art works behind. The painting was auctioned for 864,000 euros (about $1 million).
Image: Reuters
Search for the rightful owners
In November 2013, the seized art collection in Munich is made public. Since 2011, the art historian Meike Hoffmann (pictured) has been in charge of determining where the paintings come from and finding their owners. It's an extremely complicated task, charged with moral, legal and historical questions.
Image: Reuters
Who do they belong to?
Provenance researchers like Meike Hoffmann search for the origin and history of a painting. Labels on the back of the art works or business records from art dealers and auction houses can provide clues. Cornelius Gurlitt inherited the paintings from his father, yet descendants from Jewish families claim to be the legitimate owners and want them back.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa
Legal revision
According to German law, the Gurlitt case is clear: The owners' right to reclaim Nazi-looted art expired after 30 years. The Bavarian Ministry of Justice proposed to change the law surrounding this time limitation in cases where people knowingly possessed looted art. The draft is still being examined.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa
The pressure is on
The German and Bavarian governments have promised to clear up all aspects of the Gurlitt case, setting up a special task force. Until now, little has happened - only two paintings have been identified as Nazi-looted art. The experts led by Ingeborg Berggreen-Merkel are still searching for the origins of the paintings. Some of the alleged heirs are elderly and may not live to see the result.
Image: DW/H. Mund
'Why wait so long?'
David Toren, 89, is suing Germany and Bavaria. He wants the painting "Two Riders on the Beach" back. It had once belonged to his great-uncle David Friedmann, who was killed by the Nazis in 1942. Descendants of Jewish collectors whose art was confiscated are growing impatient.
Image: DW/S. Czimmek
The Gurlitt thriller, part two
New headlines shake the art world. Cornelius Gurlitt's lawyers uncover a series of paintings by Monet, Manet, Corot, Courbet and Renoir in a seemingly abandoned house belonging to the Gurlitt family in Austria. The art works are claimed to be part a private collection. Could these also be Nazi-looted art?
Image: picture-alliance/dpa
Gurlitt agrees to return some paintings
Months later, Cornelius Gurlitt strikes a deal with the German government. He is ready to allow all paintings suspected of being Nazi-looted art to be subjected to provenance research. In exchange, he gets back the works seized in 2012. On May 6, Cornelius Gurlitt dies at the age of 81 in Munich. But the thriller goes on.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/Martin Gerten
Collected willed to Swiss museum
Surprisingly, Cornelius Gurlitt bequeaths his collection to the Museum of Fine Arts Bern. He mentions in his will good memories of time spent in Switzerland. The German government greets this last will, but a part of the Gurlitt family feels bypassed.
Image: Kunstmuseum Bern
Is Gurlitt’s will valid?
Two of Gurlitt's cousins, who were not mentioned in his will, commissioned a psychiatric report to determine whether he was in his right mind when writing the legal document. The report concludes that he was not; however, the will is not contested. On November 24, the Museum of Fine Arts Bern confirms that it would accept Gurlitt's collection.