1. Skip to content
  2. Skip to main menu
  3. Skip to more DW sites

Immigration: Germany seeks 'safe countries of origin'

August 6, 2025

A verdict by the European Court of Justice is set to impact Germany's policies aiming to curb irregular immigration. It will stymie plans to determine "safe countries of origin" for possible deportations.

An airplane is seen in the sky, in the foreground barbed wire
Germany is debating how to handle irregular immigrationImage: Sebastian Gollnow/dpa/picture alliance

Safe countries of origin are those whose citizens do not have to fear state persecution, according to assessments by the German government or the European Union. Whether such assessments are accurate is a matter for debate that often ends up in court.

Last week, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that EU countries are allowed to designate safe countries of origin to fast-track asylum procedures if authorities disclose the sources for their assessment. The court also found that for a country to be designated as safe, it must offer adequate protection to the entire population, including minorities.

The Luxembourg-based court also said that while having a fast-track procedure does not violate EU law, the designation of safe countries must be subject to judicial scrutiny so migrants can challenge decisions made on their asylum claims.

Germany has its own list of safe countries of origin. Asylum-seekers from these countries hardly stand a chance of being granted asylum in Germany. Currently, eight European non-EU and two African countries are on this list.

Germany's refugee program freeze strands asylum-seekers

04:23

This browser does not support the video element.

Safe country candidates: Algeria, India, Morocco, Tunisia

The new German coalition government, of the center-right Christian Democrats and Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) and the center-left Social Democrats (SPD), had agreed to add more countries to the list in its coalition agreement earlier this year: "We are continuously assessing whether more countries meet the requirements. In particular, a country will be classified as safe if fewer than 5% of asylum-seekers from that country have been accepted over at least a five-year period."

It remains to be seen whether these plans will be as easy to implement as it sounds in the coalition agreement following the ECJ ruling. A spokesperson for the Interior Ministry, which is responsible for asylum policy, said the ruling will be reviewed.

Yet the German government still intends to reform the process for determining whether a country of origin is safe. In the future, safe countries of origin are to be determined by decree. This would mean that neither the Bundestag nor the Bundesrat (the lower and upper houses of parliament, the latter representing the 16 federal states) would have a say in the matter.

German deportations to Afghanistan spark rebuke

05:31

This browser does not support the video element.

Interior Minister Dobrindt calls for asylum law reform

The coalition has already submitted a draft bill on the issue, which is to be voted on after the parliament's summer recess. But the first debate already took place in July, and Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt took that opportunity to criticize what he sees as an insufficient number of deportations of rejected asylum-seekers.

"Our goal now is to remove the obstacles to effectively limiting illegal migration," he told lawmakers.

One such obstacle that the CSU politician highlighted was the fact that, under current law, people who have been ordered to leave the country are entitled to legal representation before their planned deportation can be enforced. This is one of the regulations that is to be abolished. Dobrindt hopes this will also speed up deportations to countries already listed as safe.

Asylum-seekers in Germany face growing uncertainty

03:00

This browser does not support the video element.

Within the European Union, there are already discussions about setting up joint centers for the repatriation of rejected asylum-seekers. The interior ministers of EU member states discussed the issue at their meeting in Copenhagen last month.

Dobrindt, who is in favor of the idea, pointed out that it can be difficult for individual member states to reach deals with non-EU countries, while it could be more expedient when several EU countries work together. Several countries already have concrete plans in place. "I wouldn't rule this out for Germany either," said the interior minister.

'Those who cannot stay should not come in the first place'

In Dobrindt's view, many of the people who came to Germany in the past were not eligible for asylum. He hopes that the planned reform will send a clear message. 

"People who come from a safe country of origin should not make the journey. Those who cannot stay should not come in the first place," he said.

Some members of the political opposition in Germany hope the European Court of Justice's ruling will force the federal government to change its course on asylum policy.

"The ECJ ruling on safe countries of origin is a major success for human rights and the individual right to asylum in Europe," said Green Party lawmaker Filiz Polat. She added that the plan to classify safe countries of origin by means of a legal directive without oversight by the Bundestag and Bundesrat is not possible.

Complex rules govern Europe's asylum process

01:18

This browser does not support the video element.

Left Party says Georgia, Moldova not safe third countries

Clara Bünger of the Left Party has also called on the governing coalition to carry out a comprehensive review of the list of safe countries of origin, saying Georgia and Moldova should be removed from this list immediately.

The reason given was the precarious human rights situation in the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Also, the Czech Republic, an EU member state, considers only parts of Moldova as safe, while the Transnistria region is controlled by pro-Russian separatists and therefore considered unsafe.

The ECJ ruling, according to Bünger, "also represents a clear repudiation of the federal government's plans to classify other countries, such as Tunisia and Algeria, as safe."

Same-sex sexual relations are punishable by law in both Tunisia and Algeria. Classifying these countries as safe would conflict with a key criterion established by the European Court of Justice's ruling: countries deemed as safe third countries must ensure the safety of their entire population.

This article was originally written in German.

While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.

Skip next section Explore more
Skip next section DW's Top Story

DW's Top Story

Skip next section More stories from DW