1. Skip to content
  2. Skip to main menu
  3. Skip to more DW sites

Italy Votes on Assisted Fertility

Sabina Castelfranco (win)June 12, 2005

Italians are called to vote in a national referendum on Sunday and Monday aimed at changing the country's law on assisted fertility, one of the most restrictive in Europe.

She's likely not to voteImage: AP

A bitter debate has broken out among supporters and opponents of the current law with church leaders and politicians strongly voicing their positions. The law, called "Law 40," regulates access to assisted fertility in Italy.

The law has only been in existence since last year. It took years of debate and members of parliament crossing party lines to finally win its approval.

Today, it's one of the toughest laws on the subject in Europe. It bans the use of donor sperm or eggs, surrogate mothers and screening, freezing, research and experimentation on embryos.

Posters showing Italian actress Sabrina Ferilli campaigning for a yes voteImage: dpa

Many believe the reason for the existence of such a restrictive law in predominantly Catholic Italy has to do with the influence of the Vatican on Italian voters.

Voting on a moral issue has enflamed the political climate with some politicians saying the church should stop interfering in state affairs. Divorce and abortion exist in Italy but it took years for those issues to become law.

Pope urges people to abstain

For the past few weeks, supporters and opponents of the law have been fiercely campaigning in an effort to win voters to their respective camps. Top church officials, including the pope himself, have urged voters to abstain.

A poster reading "Life can't be put on vote, choose not to vote" is seen inside a church in RomeImage: AP

Daniele Capezzone, leader of the Italian Radical party, said he does not believe there will be a clash between lay people and Catholics because Italian Catholics are liberals. As in the case of divorce and abortion, they will vote for freedom of choice this time as well, he said.

Politicians who favor the law have urged voters to boycott the poll. Those who oppose it say a "yes" vote should be cast to improve the existing law, to guarantee the health of women and to guarantee research.

Piero Fassino, leader of the Left Democrats party, said voters should not desert the polls.

"Going to the polls allows every opinion to be expressed," he said. "Those who like us believe the law can be changed for the better will vote 'yes,' those who want to keep it the way it is can vote 'no,' and those who want to abstain also have that option."

But not going to the polls, he added, is abstaining without having the courage to say it.

Low turnout?

A recent poll says only around 40 percent of Italians are sure to vote "yes" in the referendum. In order for the vote to be valid, 50 percent plus one of eligible voters must cast their ballots. If the quorum is not reached, the law will stay as is.

Former EU Commissioner and Radical party member Emma Bonino has been strongly urging Italians to vote "yes" on all four questions being posed.

Posters in Rome reading 'Everybody of us is a former embryo', invite voters to abstain in the four referendaImage: dpa - Bildfunk

"Women and men of this country who are responsible for their freedom, their life and their hopes for health treatment must go and vote four times 'yes,'" she said.

Doctors and scientists have taken different sides in this referendum, as have women. Not all of them have campaigned for a "yes" vote, like Olimpia Tarsi of the Committee Women and Life.

"We do not want to block research," she said. "But I would like to remind everyone that stem cells are found in embryos, in the umbilical cord and in adult tissue and to this day there is no published valid scientific paper that documents that someone's illness has been cured because of embryo stem cells."

Opponents of the referendum also say the subject matter is too complicated to be voted by the general public. They claim the matter has to be dealt with in parliament. Italy's constitutional court cleared the way for the referendum after more than four million signatures were collected in a petition which called for the law to be repealed.

Skip next section Explore more
Skip next section DW's Top Story

DW's Top Story

Skip next section More stories from DW