Twenty-one people were killed, hundreds injured. No one has been held accountable after a trial ends without a verdict. How could this be? A new documentary sheds some light on the matter.
Advertisement
Dealing with the Duisburg Love Parade disaster
03:04
Christian from Germany was 25 years old, Clara from Spain was 22 and Giulia from Italy was 21 — they were among the 200,000 young people attending the "Loveparade" techno music festival in the western city of Duisburg on July 24, 2010.
Twenty-one men and women from Germany, Australia, China, Italy, The Netherlands, and Spain lost their lives when they were crushed to death in a narrow tunnel leading to the site. 652 were injured, many more left traumatized.
Who is responsible for this tragedy, which took place in Germany, a country with high safety standards?
Hannelore Kraft, who was premier of North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), the state where Duisburg is located, promised solemnly to establish who was responsible.
People & Politics # Loveparade ends in tragedy -Duisburg after the disaster # 30.07.2010
05:30
This browser does not support the video element.
Christian's, Clara's, and Giulia's parents were among the 60 co-plaintiffs in the trial that began in 2017, in which six city officials and four representatives of the festival organizer LopaVent were charged with negligent manslaughter and causing bodily harm.
The trial was so large that it was moved from the Higher Regional Court in Düsseldorf to the city's exhibition hall.
The court said the remaining defendants were only suspected of minor guilt and that the trial might not be complete before the statute of limitations expired. The coronavirus' impact on public life made an already tight timetable untenable, the court said.
Years of torture for parents and defendants
To coincide with the 10th anniversary of the tragedy, the new documentary "Loveparade. The Trial" has been released.
Film director Dominik Wessely and scriptwriter Antje Boehmert attended all 184 days of proceedings. They interviewed victims, judges, prosecutors, defense lawyers, expert witnesses, defendants for their documentary, which offers a multi-faceted view on this legal endeavor to establish facts and responsibility.
The Spanish-German documentary begins with a tracking shot through the tunnel to the festival venue, a former railway yard. It shows a ramp at the narrow tunnel entrance — the only entrance and exit point — which became a lethal bottleneck.
The documentary shows a series of short sequences depicting masses of people, emergency workers, police.
In an effort to prevent people from entering the overcrowded site, police at the exit of the tunnel began instructing new arrivals by loudspeaker to turn back inside, while people continued pushing on into the confined space from the rear.
Christian, Clara, Giulia, and the others were crushed to death here, they died of suffocation.
"I am not seeking revenge," Christian's mother, Gabriele Müller, says on camera on the first day of the trial, she says she just wants to find out what happened so she could find her peace.
Clara's parents, Francisco Zapater und Nuria Caminal, have traveled from Tarragona in Spain. They each have a photo of their daughter pinned to their jackets as they enter the courthouse on the first day.
Clara's father tells journalists about the day they got the message of their daughter's death, how they had to identify the body, and take her home in a coffin.
A few months into proceedings he says that such a lengthy trial was "real torture, not just for the victims, but also for the defendants."
Clara's parents were among the many who would have liked to have seen the mayor of Duisburg and the owner of Lopavent, the company organizing the event, stand trial.
But both of them were called only as witnesses, denied any responsibility, and stressed that they had not been involved on the ground.
None of the involved organizations or officials took the blame for the disaster; instead, they accused each other: The festival organizer accused the police of mistakes in crowd control. The NRW state interior minister stood by the police force, assigning all the blame to the organizer's security concept and the festival personnel.
"Good morning, please take your seats." Every trial day begins with this greeting by Judge Mario Plein. In Germany, proceedings in the courtroom may not be filmed, so the makers of the documentary had actors read out testimonies from court documents and conducted interviews with observers. This is how they created an intense chronology of the trial.
Jürgen Dressler headed the construction department of the city of Duisburg in 2010. This was the office that gave the go-ahead for the festival to take place in the city's former railway freight yard, although there had been early warnings that the venue would not be able to accommodate all the partygoers.
Dressler is the only high-ranking city official who ended up in the dock. He stood accused along with five of his co-workers.
It was only when the pictures and videos of the tragedy were shown in court, that the whole thing became real for him, he says.
"I sat there and cried," he recalls. He says the pictures showed events that should never have taken place.
Dressler was one of seven defendants who accepted a deal in 2019 to pay fines in exchange for all criminal charges against them being dropped.
The three remaining defendants refused to take such a deal, saying they wanted to be acquitted in court.
A policeman's apology
Around 3,200 police officers were on-site at the festival, they were responsible for crowd control. Torsten Meyer was one of them. He testified as a witness, describing how phone lines and the internet kept breaking down, making it hard to liaise with the organizers, hard to gauge how many people had actually arrived and impossible to steer the masses. He recalls looking down from the top of a staircase thinking it looked "dangerously crowded, but not deadly."
When another officer said she could see dead bodies, he thought she must be mistaken. Later he was unsettled by the thought that he actually watched people die, "but I couldn't see it," he says.
He says it means a lot to him to be able to speak in court because he wants to tell the victims he's sorry. "I have children of my own and as a police officer I want to make sure people are safe," he says.
Mass experiment on crowd behavior
In a large experiment, researchers sent over a thousand people through narrow passages to study how crowds behave and move so that mass panic, which can lead to injury and death, can be prevented in the future.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/T. Hase
Everyone wants to get out
Everyone wants to get home as quickly as possible after a football game. There is often a crowd jam when the stadium is emptying up. In this experiment, the researchers recorded the crowd flows in a regular stadium block.
Image: Forschungszentrum Jülich
Running around chaotically
Participants running from three directions - a typical situation in an airport or a train station. Researchers from the Jülich Research Center (Forschungszentrum Jülich) want to find out how crowd flows are formed to make large events safer.
Image: Forschungszentrum Jülich
No one has an overview
A camera can identify people from above. But things are very different for someone in the crowd - people can hardly see what is happening a few meters away. That is how a dangeraous scrum can come about.
Image: Forschungszentrum Jülich
3D routes
Since the stadium stands are skewed, the cameras record the move of the people in 3D. The paths that they leave are displayed as lines. The places where most people have to go through also have many lines.
Image: Forschungszentrum Jülich
Crowd jams are visible
Every ball is a person - red balls represent people who are stuck in a jam while green ones are those who have a free way. The 3D representation also shows people who are tall and those who are small. Large people have a better overview.
Image: Forschungszentrum Jülich
Inside in the computer
The people are pushing through the exit. Their movements are recorded mathematically. The computer calculates certain formulas, which are later incorporated into models.
Image: Forschungszentrum Jülich
Ellipses to represent how people move
If people are running, they need to have a lot of room in front and behind them. The legs are otherwise in the way. That is why the computer shows them as oval. By doing so, the computer models are very close to the real thing.
Image: Forschungszentrum Jülich
From small to large
The researchers at Jülich projected the models - they added more stadium stands together. By doing so, they were able to simulate large masses of people - not just with hundreds, but thousands of people.
Image: Forschungszentrum Jülich
A whole stadium
A stadium empties. So how many people are heading to the same buses and trains can be calculated. Are there problems at the parking lots or with public transportation? How many vehicles should there be?
Image: Forschungszentrum Jülich
Corridors of different widths
The researchers built three corridors: one is 90 centimeters, and the others were 100 and 110 centimeters. The difference is very low, but while only 42 people were able to go through the narrow corridor, 50 through the wide corridor.
Image: Forschungszentrum Jülich
More space creates freedom
The red lines show it - only 20 centimeters more are enough to offer freedom to move. That means more safety at the emergency exits and escape routes.
Image: Forschungszentrum Jülich
How is oncoming traffic moving?
In the image, people are moving in opposite directions above, and with each other below. The people in red are moving against the crowd. The experiment shows how people get distributed and whether they hamper themselves.
Image: Forschungszentrum Jülich
How much room does every person have?
The same scene as a density model. Every person has a given space around him. It is clearly visible how people moving in opposite direction hamper each other.
Image: Forschungszentrum Jülich
Cultural differences
Not all people walk in the same way. That is why the researchers at Jülich compared different cultures: Germans, Indians, Chinese and Japanese. They all had to walk in circles. The result was that Indians walk faster than Germans - maybe they also get crowd jams faster.
Image: Forschungszentrum Jülich
The computer can't simulate everything
Are the fans celebrating because their team won? Or are they furious because it lost? Are they drunk? Or are they in a hurry because they want to get on their train? Such factors cannot be easily simulated by the researchers.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/T. Hase
15 images1 | 15
Jürgen Gerlach is a road safety expert. He confirms that there would have been a life-threatening congestion at the entrance of the tunnel even without the police cordoning off some of the routes. The fenced-in venue with the narrow entrance and exit were simply not suitable for such an event, he concludes.
Organized irresponsibility
When in May 2020, the trial ended without a verdict, the court issued a 44-page document explaining that it had not been possible to prove the criminal responsibility for any of the individual defenders.
Prosecutor Uwe Mühlhoff says all those who knew of the risks, but let things go ahead anyway, hold an "ethical responsibility." He says there had been "organized irresponsibility" around the event in Duisburg, where many people were involved in the planning, but in the end, it was totally unclear who was actually responsible for what.
"There are no simple answers," film director Dominik Wessely tells DW. The end of the trial must be unsatisfactory and difficult to accept, he adds.
Carla's parents are now considering taking the matter to the European Human Rights Court.
Right before the tenth anniversary of the tragedy, the NRW parliament voted to increase the compensation payments for the victims. A commission is to be established to rework the regulations for big events and come up with guidelines to facilitate the analysis of them — measures which lawyer Julius Reiter describes as "a necessary reaction to the disappointing end of the trial."
"If guilt can not be proven in court, that does not mean there is no moral responsibility," former NRW State Premier Hannelore Kraft said in parliament that day. She read out all 21 names of the victims. She wants to send a signal to survivors and victims: "We are asking for your forgiveness."
Love Parade: From humble beginnings, to major music festival, to tragic ending
What began as a peaceful festival in Berlin with only 150 attendees went on to become one of Europe's largest music festivals. However, the Love Parade was abruptly cancelled after a deadly stampede broke out in 2010.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa
Four DJs, three cars and just 150 party-goers
Matthias Roeingh, better known by his stage name Dr. Motte, organized the first Love Parade in Berlin in 1989 along with fellow DJs Jonzon, Westbam and Kid Paul. Roeingh said he wanted the festival to be seen as a protest for peace. Some 150 party-goers, followed by three cars blaring techno music, danced down Berlin's Kurfürstendamm boulevard under the banner "Peace, joy and pancakes."
Image: Imago/Travel-Stock-Image
Europe catches the love bug
It wasn't long before the Love Parade grew into one of the largest music festivals in Europe. As the number of party-goers increased, so did the number of artists and event organizers who brought their own floats, or "love mobiles," to the parade.
Image: Imago/Seeliger
Partying in the heart of the German capital
After almost half a million people flooded Berlin's Kurfürstendamm for the Love Parade in 1996, it became clear that a larger venue was needed. The following year, the festival was moved to Berlin's Straße des 17. Juni (17th of June Street), with the Victory Column, Brandenburg Gate and Tiergarten Park providing a historic backdrop to the frenzied techno rave.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/P. Grimm
More stress than love
But as the festival attracted ever more revelers, it also attracted more trouble ... and much, much more rubbish. Mountains of garbage in the Tiergarten became a common sight, to the disgust of many locals. However, because the Love Parade was still, in theory, a political festival, Berlin's state government had to bear the costs, both for security and for the mass clean-ups.
Image: Imago/Müller-Stauffenberg
Ravers protest festival commercialization
For all its controversies, the main point of criticism directed at the festival was its increasing commercialization. Love Parade organizers made a pretty profit through licensing, advertising and merchandise sales. However, that also drove many techno heads to distance themselves from the Love Parade, with some even starting an annual counter festival, know as the "F*** Parade" (pictured above).
Image: Imago/Seeliger
Out with the politics
In 2001, Germany's Constitutional Court revoked the Love Parade's classification as a demonstration. The court found that the festival offered no clear political message, a requisite for any protest. Since organizers did not want to bear the security or clean-up costs, the 2004 and 2005 Love Parade festivals were cancelled.
Image: Imago/Enters
'The Love is back!'
Under the banner "The Love is back!" the Love Parade relaunched in 2006, bringing more than a million revelers to Berlin. But it would also be the last edition to take place in the German capital. That year, Rainer Schaller, an entrepreneur who runs a chain of fitness centers, took over the company in charge of organizing the festival. His plan was to bring the Love Parade to Germany's Ruhr area.
Image: Sean Gallup/Getty Images
A record attendance in the Ruhr metropolises
According to the Love Parade organizers, more than a million flocked to the city of Essen for the first edition of the festival in western Germany in 2007, while some 1.6 million people partied in Dortmund the following year. Several people, however, have claimed that the numbers were massively inflated by organizers, likely for marketing purposes.
Image: AP
Bochum refuses Love Parade invitation
High on the festival's successes in Essen and Dortmund, organizers wanted to bring the Love Parade to the city of Bochum in 2009. However, city officials refused, citing security concerns. This ultimately forced the party to be cancelled in 2009, provoking outrage from seasoned ravers and parade-goers.
Image: Imago
The horrific ending
Organizers wanted to make up for the lost year by staging a massive festival in Duisburg in 2010. The festival coincided with the city's selection as a European Capital of Culture and attracted over a million visitors. But the party ended in tragedy. Panic broke out as crowds converged in a tunnel leading to the festival grounds, resulting in the deaths of 21 people, and injuring a further 650.
Image: AP
Never again
The very same day as the deadly stampede, Love Parade organizers announced that there would be no further festivals. Every year on July 24, Germany comes together to commemorate the victims of the festival tragedy.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa
Love Parade disaster goes to trial
In December 2017, more than seven years after the tragic Love Parade incident, prosecutors launched criminal proceedings against six Duisburg city employees and four festival organizers. The trial is set to be one of Germany's largest ever court cases, with 70 lawyers involved — 32 representing defendants and 38 representing 65 joint plaintiffs, mainly relatives of the young people killed.