A Belarus court has ruled against AP journalist who reported on milk farms near Chernobyl. In the story, the correspondent claimed that the milk contained massive amounts of radioactive material.
Advertisement
The Minsk court ordered the reporter, Yuras Karmanau, to pay legal fees and write a retraction, the Russian news agency RIA Novosti reported on Friday.
In the original Associated Press article from April, Karmanau says he traveled to the edge of Belarus' Chernobyl exclusion zone and talked to farmers who herd milk cows in the area. He claims that AP employees passed a milk sample to a government-run lab, and that the results revealed radioactive isotope strontium-90, appearing in concentration 10 times higher than the allowed level.
The author also featured a comment from Milkavita, the company that buys milk from the farms, with the firm dismissing the findings as "impossible" and a likely "mix-up."
The result were also disputed after the story was published, both by the cited lab and a special Belarus government department for dealing with the aftermath of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster. The lab said that the there was not enough milk in the 1100-gram sample and that three liters of milk were necessary for a proper strontium-90 test, according to Belaurs news outlet Naviny.
Milkavita then sued Karmanau for "intentionally false reporting" and damaging their reputation.
AP 'looks forward' to appeal
Commenting on the Friday verdict, AP's vice president Ian Phillips said that the news agency "unreservedly" stands behind their employee.
"Mr. Karmanau's reporting is a fair and accurate account of the lingering effects of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster on Belarus 30 years after the accident," he said. "The court's refusal to consider key evidence in support of Mr. Karmanau raises serious concerns, and AP looks forward to vindication on appeal."
Milkavita's dairy products are mostly sold in Russia.
Chernobyl: 30 years on
The accident at the Chernobyl nuclear plant on April 26, 1986, released large amounts of radiation into the environment, in Ukraine and across Europe. Decades on, problems continue to haunt the site.
Image: CC/Activ Solar
Terrible accident
It's considered to be the most severe nuclear disaster of all time: On April 26, 1986, an explosion and fire at the Chernobyl nuclear plant in Ukraine released massive amounts of radiation into the atmosphere. The Soviet Union, which at the time had jurisdiction over Chernobyl, didn't publicize that the accident had happened until the first radiation plume set off alarms in Sweden.
Image: picture-alliance/ dpa
The fallout spreads
Radioactive clouds spread in virtually every direction during the week after the meltdown at Chernobyl. Areas close to the plant - in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia - were heavily contaminated. Heightened levels of radiation were also measured across nearly all of Europe after the accident. The so-called 'exclusion zone' around Chernobyl remains off-limits to human habitation to this day.
Damaging radiation
Aside from the dozens of people who died as a direct result of the accident, thousands more were later struck with cancer. An increase in mutations and birth defects was also noted among children of people exposed to radiation, as seen in this photo from 1989. Animals in the region also suffered from infertility or birth defects after the disaster.
Image: picture-alliance / dpa
Into the food chain
Rainfall in the months after the Chernobyl reactor meltdown washed nuclear fallout into the foodchain, affecting livestock and wild game across Europe. Of the nearly half a million wild boars hunted and slaughtered in Germany in 2010, more than 1,000 contained higher-than-allowed levels of radioactive contamination.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa
Ghost towns
Although the exclusion zone was evacuated and badly-affected areas were dismantled and buried, severe effects of the nuclear disaster are expected to continue in the area for at least another hundred years. Some heavily-contaminated regions won't be completely free from radiation and safe for human habitation for another 20,000 years, studies show.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa
New protective shell
The concrete cap built over the nuclear plant right after the disaster has been showing signs of decay recently and needs to be replaced. A new steel containment shell is currently being built on-site with more than 2 billion euros (nearly $2.5 billion) of international funding. It will be slid into place over the old sarcophagus by 2016.
Image: DW/Y.Teyze
Animal numbers rising
After humans left the Chernobyl area in 1986, wildlife moved back into the newly-available habitat. Although some plants have genetic mutations, biodiversity appears to have increased partially. Some scientists even think the radiation may be speeding up adaptation. The zone has become a type of involuntary park, with predators such as wolves and eagles, and reintroduced wild horses.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa
Preserved, until the next fire
In March of this year, a study was published showing that trees in the nearby Red Forest - where trees turned a rusty color and died after the disaster - are decaying slower than normal. This is due to a lack of living microbes and organisms in the area. Due to this excess of dried wood, a catastrophic wildfire could result, which could destroy the forest completely.
Image: T.A. Mousseau and A.P. Møller
Disaster renewed
Nearly 25 years after the Chernobyl disaster spread fear across Europe, an earthquake and tsunami triggered a meltdown at the nuclear plant in Fukushima, Japan in March 2011. Some countries have since reacted by shifting their focus away from nuclear power and towards renewable energy. Germany has pledged to close its nuclear reactors by 2022.
Image: dapd
Green energy?
If the national renewable energy plan is maintained, the share of renewable energy could reach 13 percent by 2030. But foreign investors were somewhat scared off when the Ukrainian energy commission sharply reduced its feed-in tariff at the beginning of 2015. So although Ukraine has been working on renewable energy, its future seems uncertain.