Scientists find Tyrannosaurus had three species, not one
Tanika Godbole
March 1, 2022
A group of researchers say the "most famous of all dinosaurs actually includes three species." Some scientists not involved with the study have raised doubts though.
Advertisement
A group of three researchers has proposed that the Tyrannosaurus dinosaur actually included three species, and not just the single rex, according to a new study.
A team of three researchers led by Baltimore-based independent paleontologist Gregory Paul on Monday said variations they noticed in an examination of about three dozen Tyrannosaurus fossils warranted the recognition of two additional species: T. imperator, meaning "tyrant lizard emperor," and T. regina, meaning "tyrant lizard queen."
"The variation in Tyrannosaurus is beyond the norms for dinosaurs," said Paul, the lead researcher. "Two new species had occurred before the final dinosaur extinction. The most famous of all dinosaurs and the ultimate apex predator actually includes three species."
Tyrannosaurus rex, meaning "tyrant lizard king," once prowled in North America during the Cretaceous period. The species was wiped out when an asteroid struck Mexico's Yucatan peninsula some 66 million years ago.
They cited differences in the build of the thighbone or femur, and differences in the number of small teeth at the lower jaw tip among the 37 fossils they examined.
Paul said the differences were much like the ones between a lion (Panthera leo) and a tiger (Panthera tigris).
Lions and tigers are members of the same genus, Panthera, but have enough differences to be recognized as separate species.
Beasts that could come back from extinction
Biodiversity is being lost so fast some scientists describe it as Earth's sixth mass extinction, an event to rival the end of the dinosaurs. But could our capacity for destruction be tempered by powers of resurrection?
Image: Imago/Science Photo Library/L. Calvetti
No fear of a T-Rex sequel
Five films on, Jurassic Park still has us captivated by the idea of humans coming face-to-face with our planet's most terrifying former inhabitants. But the fantasy of resurrecting a dinosaur from DNA in the belly of an amber-trapped mosquito is a long way from reality. Leading de-extinction scientists say making use of genetic material more than a million years old won't be possible.
Image: picture-alliance/United Archiv/IFTN
And then there were two
Since the last male northern white rhino — a 45-year-old called Sudan — died earlier in 2018, elderly females Najon and Fatu are the last of their kind. But scientists hope that embryos in deep freeze could bring the "functionally extinct" species back from the edge. They were created in vitro from the sperm of a deceased male northern white and the eggs of the closely related southern white.
Image: DW/Andrew Wasike
Not so dead after all?
When the dodo — a fatally trusting and tasty bird — disappered from Mauritius in the 17th century, few believed mankind could extinguish the life of an entire species. Only after 19th century naturalist Georges Cuvier proved extinction was possible did the dodo became a symbol of that destructive power. Now, the hunt is on for dodo DNA, in the hope we may also prove our power to resurrect.
Image: Imago/StockTrek Images/D. Eskridge
Fragile life
By the time the last Pyrenean ibex Celia died in 2000, scientists had already gathered and frozen her tissue cells. Three years later, a goat gave birth to Celia's clone, created by injecting her DNA into a goat's egg. In fact, dozens of hybrid eggs were implanted. Only seven animals became pregnant, and one carried to full term — and the resurrected ibex survived only a few minutes after birth.
Image: picture-alliance/blickwinkel/C. Wermter
Passage from the past
This is Martha, the last passenger pigeon, who died in 1914. The plump North American birds were a favorite for the plate, and hunting combined with deforestation wiped them out even as conservationists warned of their senseless demise. Revive & Restore, an organization that promotes "de-extinction," sees the passenger pigeon as the perfect model project to show resurrection science's potential.
Image: Donald E. Hurlbert, Smithsonian Institution
Numbat mother
European colonists in Australia put a bounty on the head of the thylacine, or Tasmanian tiger, a marsupial apex predator. The last known member of the species died in Hobart Zoo in 1936. Now, scientists have decoded the animal's entire genome from a joey preserved in ethanol, and hope to insert its genes into the DNA of its closest surviving relative, a diminutive marsupial called the numbat.
Image: Getty Images/AFP/T. Blackwood
Pleistocene Park
The most impressive species with any chance of making a comeback is the woolly mammoth, whose closest living relative is the Asian elephant. Scientists at Harvard University say the ice-age giants could play a role in slowing permafrost melt and, therefore, climate change. But their "Pleistocene Park" concept would need 80,000 animals to have any real impact — pure science fiction, say critics.
Image: Imago/Science Photo Library/L. Calvetti
One heck of a cow
The auroch once roamed the length and breadth of Eurasia, but hunting and habitat loss wiped them out close to 400 years ago. Yet their descendents — domesticated cattle — live on, and "back-breeding" programs have tried to resurrect the auroch by selecting for characteristics of the wild ancestor. An early German attempt resulted in Heck cattle, which have been reintroduced to parts of Europe.
Image: Imago/Nature Picture Library/P. Clement
Meet the ancestors
We once shared the planet with other human species, like the Neanderthal, with whom we even interbred. Many of us still carry Neanderthal DNA. But we are also prime suspects in their extermination. What would it be like to confront the relations we once wiped out? Scientists are growing homo sapiens-Neanderthal hybrid brain matter in the lab to examine the differences between them and us.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa
9 images1 | 9
Other experts not convinced
Some scientists not involved with the study have raised doubts over the findings of the research, and said the conclusions will take more persuading.
Advertisement
"I understand the temptation to divide T. rex into different species, because there is some variation in the fossil bones that we have," Stephen Brusatte, paleontologist at the University of Edinburgh, told the Reuters news agency.
"It's hard to define a species, even for animals today, and these fossils have no genetic evidence that can test whether there were truly separate populations. Until I see much stronger evidence, these are all still T. rex to me, and that's what I'll be calling them," Brusatte added.
Thomas Carr, a T. rex expert at Carthage College, also disputed the findings, saying they were at odds with his own research in the field. "I found no evidence of more than one species. And if that signal was in the data, I would have picked it up," he was reported as saying in The Guardian.
"Perhaps most damning is the fact that the authors were unable to refer several excellent skulls to any of the three species," Carr said. "If their species are valid, then more than just two features should identify them: Nearly every detail, especially in the head, should be different."
A dinosaur on the move
02:56
T. rex renowned for its bite
The Tyrannosaurus rex had a very large head and tremendous bite strength. It walked on two legs, and had two small hands with two fingers.
The largest-known Tyrannosaurus is a specimen named Sue at the Field Museum in Chicago, at 12.3 meters * and an estimated 9 tons. The new study suggests that Sue is not a T. rex, but a T. imperator.