The SESAME synchrotron in Jordan is an ambitious scientific, political and social experiment — since way before it even started producing results. DW's Zulfikar Abbany spent a week in the Middle East to find out why.
Advertisement
Ask a physicist "what's a synchrotron?" ... and they'll call it a huge light bulb.
Synchrotrons let scientists see the smallest things — from material details in the Dead Sea Scrolls to living matter, water purity, disease, and universe-defining particles.
They are complex, ring-shaped machines that produce an intense beam of light. That light is used to illuminate things that scientists want to study, whether that's a physical material or a biological sample, for instance. And the stronger the beam of light, the sharper the image of the sample.
It's basically the best camera you ever had. To the power of a squillion.
There are synchrotrons around the world, with many in Europe and the USA, others in Asia-Pacific.
But there's only one in the whole of the Middle East. It's called the Synchrotron-Light for Experimental Science and Applications in the Middle East (or SESAME for short). And it's located in Allan, north of the Jordanian capital, Amman.
Science, and a dream of peace
It's taken decades of dreaming, planning and building. But the SESAME synchrotron has just started shining an intense light on the science than can — and cannot — be done amidst the politics of the Middle East.
Accelerating particles for peace
05:37
It is doing what it set out to do — to attract scientists from around the region, whether they're from Israel, Jordan, Egypt or elsewhere, and have them work together on quasi-neutral ground. And, ultimately, on peace.
Above all, SESAME is delivering scientific results.
On their doorstep
SESAME's member states include Cyprus, Egypt, Iran, Israel, Jordan, Pakistan, the Palestinian Authority and Turkey.
And already it's proved incredibly practical for scientists to have a synchrotron on their door step. Traveling long distances with fragile archeological samples to facilities farther afield can be a hair-raising ordeal.
With SESAME, you could theoretically jump in a car at dawn, do your "beamtime," and be back home in time for your dinner — the operative word being "theoretically," because Jordanian customs is on a whole other level of odd.
But theoretically… SESAME is a stone's throw away for many scientists working in the Middle East.
Unless they're Palestinian.
No collaboration under occupation
If you're a Palestinian scientist from Bethlehem, Nablus or any other part of Israel under Palestinian authority, and you're driving with Palestinian plates, a simple commute can turn into a thing of days.
Roads close inexplicably from one minute to the next. You get held up at checkpoints or sent on detours around three hills... when yesterday you were allowed to take a five-minute short cut.
And that's just to get to your university laboratory. Crossing borders to work at a foreign synchrotron is on another level.
But then if you're Palestinian, you may not get invited in the first place. That is, if SESAME's scientific committee deems your proposal too weak. And with some Palestinian scientists coming from very weak universities that rely on 1950s equipment that was donated by the UK, getting rejected is a strong possibility.
At time of writing, no proposals from Palestinian researchers have been awarded beamtime at SESAME.
During a week-long tour, we spoke to scientists at the Weizmann Institute, and others from the Hebrew University and Tel Aviv University. They all said they were keen on collaboration. There was a sense of apprehension, but also a sense of freedom that allowed them to give collaboration a go.
Meanwhile, in Palestine, there were other forces at work, and one line that rings out from campus to campus:
"No collaboration under occupation."
When you hear that for the first time, it's like a mallet to the head.
There's silence. (Perhaps only interrupted by the sound of Israeli fighter jets overhead.) And then a sense of dumbfounded... well, dumbness.
Then, an "Oh. My. God."
A moment later, those old journalistic instincts kick in and you hear yourself blurting, "Yes, but surely…! I mean... erm…"
So, they repeat the line: "No collaboration under occupation. No collaboration under occupation."
That's your three strikes and you're out.
The situation is so sensitive, I can't even tell you who said it first. They won't let me. Others said it, too; and I'll quote them, but later, as this diaryprogresses, and try to explain why they said it.
But for now, all I'll say is that those four words left me confused.
Through the prism of our common, Western media coverage, you might think, "Oh, yeah, like, that makes sense. I mean, these are oppressed people, right? I get it."
And inside you let out a little cry of "Freedom!"
But upfront, in your face, staring into the eyes of Palestinian physicists, trained in France or the USA, now back home as heads of their departments… and it's a different feeling altogether. Especially when you consider what SESAME is trying to achieve.
No standard model
SESAME is modeled on CERN, one of Europe's post-war peace projects. The idea there was to provide a neutral place for scientists to collaborate. CERN's canteen is renowned as a hub of cross-cultural interaction.
It's created fertile ground for science. And the science is top-notch. Among CERN's biggest achievements is its detection of the "elusive" Higgs boson — or God particle — in 2012. That may or may not mean much to you, either way is fine. The Higgs boson is not the sort of thing you need to think about every day. But, then heck, without CERN we probably wouldn't have the World Wide Web as we know it. And that's got to mean something to everyone.
But the Middle East is not Europe. And SESAME is not CERN.
Still, it's a good thing that SESAME has CERN at its side, like a big brother, advocate or mentor.
In July, CERN organized a field trip for a group of science journalists from Europe and the USA, including this writer. We visited scientists in Jerusalem, Bethlehem and Nablus before stopping at SESAME, north of Amman.
Some of the most enlightening moments were those that had very little to do with science, but things like farming, family life or standing on a road where the macadam just stops and that's a border between tolerance and a precarious kind of peace.
It was a week in the Middle East but we barely started to scratch the surface of why SESAME is such an ambitious project and why it has yet to succeed.
This is just the beginning.
That was part one of Zulfikar Abbany's SESAME diary. Read more here:
Postscript: This article was amended on September 25-26, 2019, to reflect some very valuable feedback from James Gillies at CERN on the science of synchrotrons. My thanks to James!
A history of the Middle East peace process
For over half a century, disputes between Israelis and Palestinians over land, refugees and holy sites remain unresolved. DW gives you a short history of when the conflict flared and when attempts were made to end it.
UN Security Council Resolution 242, 1967
United Nations Security Council Resolution 242, passed on November 22, 1967, called for the exchange of land for peace. Since then, many of the attempts to establish peace in the region have referred to 242. The resolution was written in accordance with Chapter VI of the UN Charter, under which resolutions are recommendations, not orders.
Image: Getty Images/Keystone
Camp David Accords, 1978
A coalition of Arab states, led by Egypt and Syria, fought Israel in the Yom Kippur or October War in October 1973. The conflict eventually led to the secret peace talks that yielded two agreements after 12 days. This picture from March 26, 1979, shows Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, his US counterpart Jimmy Carter and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin after signing the accords in Washington.
Image: picture-alliance/AP Photo/B. Daugherty
The Madrid Conference, 1991
The US and the former Soviet Union came together to organize a conference in the Spanish capital. The discussions involved Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and the Palestinians — not from the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) — who met with Israeli negotiators for the first time. While the conference achieved little, it did create the framework for later, more productive talks.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/J. Hollander
Oslo I Accord, 1993
The negotiations in Norway between Israel and the PLO, the first direct meeting between the two parties, resulted in the Oslo I Accord. The agreement was signed in the US in September 1993. It demanded that Israeli troops withdraw from West Bank and Gaza Strip and a self-governing, interim Palestinian authority be set up for a five-year transitional period. A second accord was signed in 1995.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/A. Sachs
Camp David Summit Meeting, 2000
US President Bill Clinton invited Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat to the retreat in July 2000 to discuss borders, security, settlements, refugees and Jerusalem. Despite the negotiations being more detailed than ever before, no agreement was concluded. The failure to reach a consensus at Camp David was followed by renewed Palestinian uprising, the Second Intifada.
Image: picture-alliance/AP Photo/R. Edmonds
The Arab Peace Initiative, 2002
The Camp David negotiations were followed first by meetings in Washington and then in Cairo and Taba, Egypt — all without results. Later the Arab League proposed the Arab Peace Initiative in Beirut in March 2002. The plan called on Israel to withdraw to pre-1967 borders so that a Palestinian state could be set up in the West Bank and Gaza. In return, Arab countries would agree to recognize Israel.
Image: Getty Images/C. Kealy
The Roadmap, 2003
The US, EU, Russia and the UN worked together as the Middle East Quartet to develop a road map to peace. While Palestinian Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas accepted the text, his Israeli counterpart Ariel Sharon had more reservations with the wording. The timetable called for a final agreement on a two-state solution to be reached in 2005. Unfortunately, it was never implemented.
Image: Getty Iamges/AFP/J. Aruri
Annapolis, 2007
In 2007, US President George W. Bush hosted a conference in Annapolis, Maryland, to relaunch the peace process. Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas took part in talks with officials from the Quartet and over a dozen Arab states. It was agreed that further negotiations would be held with the goal of reaching a peace deal by the end of 2008.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/S. Thew
Washington, 2010
In 2010, US Middle East Envoy George Mitchell convinced Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to agree to and implement a 10-month moratorium on settlements in disputed territories. Later, Netanyahu and Abbas agreed to relaunch direct negotiations to resolve all issues. Negotiations began in Washington in September 2010, but within weeks there was a deadlock.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa/M. Milner
Cycle of escalation and ceasefire continues
A new round of violence broke out in and around Gaza in late 2012. A ceasefire was reached between Israel and those in power in the Gaza Strip, which held until June 2014. The kidnapping and murder of three Israeli teenagers in June 2014 resulted in renewed violence and eventually led to the Israeli military operation Protective Edge. It ended with a ceasefire on August 26, 2014.
Image: picture-alliance/dpa
Paris summit, 2017
Envoys from over 70 countries gathered in Paris, France, to discuss the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. Netanyahu slammed the discussions as "rigged" against his country. Neither Israeli nor Palestinian representatives attended the summit. "A two-state solution is the only possible one," French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault said at the opening of the event.
Image: Reuters/T. Samson
Deteriorating relations in 2017
Despite the year's optimistic opening, 2017 brought further stagnation in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. A deadly summer attack on Israeli police at the Temple Mount, a site holy to both Jews and Muslims, sparked deadly clashes. Then US President Donald Trump's plan to move the US Embassy to Jerusalem prompted Palestinian leader Abbas to say "the measures ... undermine all peace efforts."
Image: Reuters/A. Awad
Trump's peace plan backfires, 2020
US President Donald Trump presented a peace plan that freezes Israeli settlement construction but retains Israeli control over most of the illegal settlements it has already built. The plan would double Palestinian-controlled territory but asks Palestinians to cross a red line and accept the previously constructed West Bank settlements as Israeli territory. Palestinians reject the plan.
Image: Reuters/M. Salem
Conflict reignites in 2021
Plans to evict four families and give their homes in East Jerusalem to Jewish settlers led to escalating violence in May 2021. Hamas fired over 2,000 rockets at Israel, and Israeli military airstrikes razed buildings in the Gaza Strip. The international community, including Germany's Foreign Ministry, called for an end to the violence and both sides to return to the negotiating table.