The UK High Court has rejected a challenge to government plans to construct a tunnel underneath the UNESCO World Heritage Site Stonehenge. Just a few years ago the same court had upheld the complaint.
Advertisement
The High Court in London on Monday rejected a bid to stop the construction of a controversial road tunnel near the prehistoric megalithic stone circle Stonehenge in southwest England.
The case pitted British campaigners — and to some extent UNESCO, which named Stonehenge a World Heritage Site in 1986 — against the government, the National Highways agency and the National Trust, a charity that maintains British sites of natural beauty and historical significance.
The Save Stonehenge World Heritage Site group and a private individual who owns land near the proposed construction site, Andy Rhind-Tutt, had argued that plans to build the tunnel, particularly the western section nearer Stonehenge, could cause "permanent and irreversible damage to the site."
The government had initially approved similar plans in 2020, but an appeal against them was successful at the same court, the highest for such issues in England and Wales, in 2021.
Last year, the project was reactivated by the government and at the second attempt the challenge in court failed.
Judge David Holgate largely dismissed the campaigners' claims in Monday's ruling, calling many of them "unarguable."
Holgate said that ministers had "rightly focused on the relevant policies" when making the plans, and that the campaigners' evidence "provides no basis to undermine that conclusion."
What do the proponents argue?
The government and National Highways argue that the tunnel is necessary to relieve traffic on the stretch of the A303 trunk road around the Stonehenge, Amesbury and Salisbury areas.
Advertisement
The busy road is a major route connecting the southwest of England to London. Parts of it follow the route of a road originally constructed by the Romans referred to as the Fosse Way.
Much of the A303 is a broad dual carriageway. But the hilly and twisty segment around Stonehenge reverts to a single-lane stretch. It's a recognized accident and traffic black spot, with roughly double the average accident rates for a road of its kind, according to National Highways.
Proponents also argue that the tunnel will reduce noise and visual pollution for the roughly 1 million annual visitors at Stonehenge, by moving the vehicles out of sight.
The 3.3-kilometer (roughly 2-mile) tunnel is expected to cost around 1.7 billion pounds (roughly €2 billion or $2.1 billion)
What do the opponents argue?
The Save Stonehenge World Heritage Site Alliance, a company formed to pool resources of opponents to the plan, argues that the tunnel could imperil Stonehenge or other areas of historical significance in the area. It said it intends to appeal the decision.
"While this judgement is a huge blow and exposes the site to National Highway's state-sponsored vandalism, we will continue the fight. In the dying days of this Conservative Government, which has inflicted so much damage on the country, we cannot let it destroy our heritage as well." John Adams, the group's chairman, said.
They also say the construction will alter the topography and the local views of the monument.
It proposed a bypass for the area and the city of Salisbury as an alternative that it said would negate the issue.
But Judge Holgate found that this would in turn pose risks for protected conservation areas or areas of natural beauty in the southwest of England.
"South Wiltshire needs a decent road network, Salisbury needs a bypass and surprise surprise, if that happens a Stonehenge Tunnel wouldn't be required," Andy Rhind-Tutt wrote after Monday's verdict. He advised Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Transport Secretary Danny Kruger to "save the money ... and use it wisely instead."
UNESCO following case closely too
UNESCO said last year, amid the hearing, that it was "profoundly regrettable" that the British government had re-issued planning permission applications for the scheme "without introducing changes consistent with previous Committee decisions and the advice of the 2022 Advisory mission."
It argued that this "constitutes a potential threat to the OUV of the property," a reference to "Outstanding Universal Value," a criteria for selecting World Heritage Sites.
It has, however, welcomed some other development and conservation projects around Stonehenge.
UNESCO World Heritage Sites under threat
The World Heritage Committee continually reviews whether certain sites deserve to keep their title. Some fail the test, ending up on the so-called red list. This time, the future of some important places is on the line.
Image: Eberhard Thonfeld/imago images
Venice: no more tourists on giant boats
Two years ago, the mayor of Venice asked UNESCO to put his city on the List of World Heritage in Danger. This cry for help came due to overtourism in the northern Italy city, especially from cruise ships. These have now been banned. But will Venice keep its original UNESCO title? The World Heritage Committee will decide in July whether Venice still needs to be put on the endangered list.
Image: Eberhard Thonfeld/imago images
Stonehenge: highway along prehistoric rocks
The rock formation known as Stonehenge in southern England has been a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1986. Dating back more than 4,000 years, the site attracts almost one million tourists each year. But construction of the A303 highway, which passes directly in front of the megalithic structure and connects the towns of Berwick and Amesbury, could relegate Stonehenge to the red list.
Image: Dae Sasitorn/imago images
Lake Ohrid: too many visitors
Lake Ohrid is the oldest lake in Europe and one of the most ancient in the world. Researchers date it around 1.36 million years of age. Most of Lake Ohrid is part of North Macedonia while a smaller part belongs to Albania. In 1979, UNESCO elevated the ancient lake to World Heritage status. But due to large-scale tourism, it is now threatened with being put on the red list.
Image: picture alliance / Zoonar
Auschwitz-Birkenau: solemn character under threat
Auschwitz-Birkenau has been designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1979. More than 1.1 million people were murdered at this Nazi death camp alone. However, the World Heritage Committee criticizes the fact that major nearby transport infrastructure projects could tarnish the solemn character of the memorial site, adding that local authorities have not responded to these concerns.
Image: imago images/robertharding
Kamchatka Peninsula: Exploitation of nature
After being designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site for 25 years, the volcanic region on the Kamchatka Peninsula in far-eastern Russia could be banished to the red list. The reasons are many: From illegal fishing to the unlawful exploitation of mineral resources such as gold to the destruction of wildlife habitat. These are some of the wide-ranging consequences of political mismanagement.
Image: Alexei Maishev/Tass/imago images
Lamu Town: Kenya's site under threat
Kenya's oldest continuously inhabited city is around 750 years old, and its picturesque old town was added to the UNESCO World Heritage List 20 years ago. But charming Lamu Town on Lamu island is in danger of being placed on the red list as the city has a huge waste problem. Planned construction projects such as an oil pipeline and an airport are making things worse.
Image: Sergi Reboredo/picture alliance
Great Barrier Reef: climate change wreaking havoc
The Great Barrier Reef was awarded UNESCO World Heritage status in 1981. It consists of almost 3,000 individual coral reefs and extends for about 2,300 kilometers (1,430 miles). But due to climate change and rising water temperatures, it has lost more than half of its coral. Storms, gas drilling and shipwrecks also pose threats to the World Heritage status of the underwater wonderworld.
Image: Kyodo/MAXPPP/picture alliance
Sundarban mangrove forests: Bangladesh and India share the blame
The largest mangrove forests on earth cover an area of more than 10,000 square kilometers, two-thirds of which are located in Bangladesh and one-third in India. The area is home to many endangered species such as the Bengal tiger and has been a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1997. But due to poaching, water pollution, deforestation and rising sea levels, it might be placed on the red list.
Image: NASA/ZUMA Wire/picture alliance
Selous wildlife reserve: Tanzania hanging by a thread
Soon after it was awarded World Heritage status in 1982, UNESCO started criticizing "illegal activities” taking place in the largest controlled wildlife reserve in Africa. With too much tourism, increased exploitation of mineral resources, a controversial dam project and rampant animal poaching, Selous was placed on the red list in 2014. Will it now lose the World Heritage title?
Image: Greg Armfield/AP/picture alliance
Liverpool: Maritime Mercantile City under immediate threat
Liverpool's Maritime Mercantile City is also facing its exclusion from the World Heritage List. Just eight years after it was awarded the title in 2004, it was already placed on the red list because the buildings were not adequately maintained. Construction projects in the surrounding areas also had a negative impact on the character of the site. The World Heritage title could now be withdrawn.
Image: Debu55y/Panthermedia/imago images
10 images1 | 10
Druids, Romans, Anglo-Saxons all present in area, several other historical sites surround Stonehenge
The area around Stonehenge in South Wiltshire appears to have been of considerable significance to druids in neolithic Britain.
In very close proximity to Stonehenge, there also lies the less renowned Avebury Ring stone circle, the West Kennett Long Barrow, which is thought to be even older than Stonehenge, and the artificially constructed chalk mound Silbury Hill, the tallest prehistoric human-made mound in Europe whose purpose is still debated.
Later, Romans were present in the area in numbers. And Wilton near Salisbury was also a site of considerable significance during the Anglo-Saxon era and the 9th century amid the reign of King Alfred the Great of Wessex. He was the first king to also call himself King of the Anglo-Saxons and is seen by some as either the first king of England, or the monarch who enabled that title to later come into being.
Some have also questioned what other potentially undiscovered relics or archaeological material might be endangered by the tunnel's construction.
Wiltshire-born antiquities historian Tom Holland, a co-founder of the Save Stonehenge Alliance who in 2020 presented a 50,000-signature petition to then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson when the plans were first launched, also lamented the ruling.
"A devastating loss, not just for everyone who has campaigned against the Government's pig-headed plans for the Stonehenge landscape, but for Britain, for the world, and for subsequent generations," Holland wrote, before adding, "the fight, however, goes on."
Exhibition: The world of Stonehenge
Stonehenge in southern England is unique — but the stone circle is too big to fit in a museum. An exhibition at the British Museum gives it a new context, with hundreds of spectacular finds from the Bronze Age.
Image: Richard Gray/EMPICS/DPR/picture alliance
Stonehenge — 2,500 B.C.
One of Britain's most iconic monuments — Stonehenge — has inspired an intriguing exhibition by the British Museum. Tracing 3,000 years of European prehistory, from the hunter-gatherers of the Mesolithic period to the artists and astronomers of the late Bronze Age, it reveals people’s changing ideas, skills and beliefs.
Image: Toby Melville/REUTERS
'Seahenge' — 2,000 B.C.
4,000-year-old wooden posts formed a circle on a beach in Norfolk, at a ritual site built 500 years after the Stonehenge stone circle. The formation was dubbed "Seahenge." The 54 split oak posts stand up to three meters high and once encircled an upturned oak tree root. The British Museum is currently exhibiting Seahenge and other exhibits from the Bronze Age.
Image: Richard Gray/EMPICS/DPR/picture alliance
Nebra Sky Disk — 1,600 B.C.
The Bronze Age is full of treasures, some of which are now on display at the British Museum. One of the world-famous objects includes the Nebra Sky Disc, the oldest known surviving map of the cosmos. It was discovered in the eastern German state of Saxony-Anhalt, and it is on loan to the British Museum from a museum in Halle an der Saale.
Image: Alastair Grant/AP Photo/picture alliance
Bone necklace — 2,100-1,900 B.C.
Four thousand years ago, a man wore this necklace made of animal bones. It was found in 2002 near Stonehenge in the grave of the "Amesbury Archer," who was nicknamed so because he was buried with 16 arrowheads among other things. The archer came from a region on the border of what is now Germany and Switzerland. As early as the Bronze Age, people and goods moved across Europe.
Image: Alastair Grant/AP Photo/picture alliance
Sacrificial ox — 3,300-3,000 B.C.
Recent research has repeatedly confirmed that people in the Bronze Age were eager to travel and migrate. That is why the British Museum is displaying countless pieces from countries including Ireland, France, Italy, Germany, Denmark and Switzerland. The remains of this ox, which was offered as an animal sacrifice 5,000 years ago, come from Saxony-Anhalt in Germany.
This unusual tall hat made of gold, which was presumably used as a ceremonial hat for sun rituals, also comes from an area in what is now Germany. It was discovered by a worker in 1835 in a field near Schifferstadt. Therefore, it is also known as the "Golden Hat of Schifferstadt."
Image: Alastair Grant/AP Photo/picture alliance
Spiritual warriors — 11,00-500 B.C.
These wooden figures with large eyes and sexual organs were found in Yorkshire in England. They are carved from the wood of yew trees, which in some ancient mythologies mark the entrance to the underworld. Yew trees can live for over 1,000 years. The oldest specimens today are found in Britain.
This golden brooch was discovered in the English county of Shropshire on the border with Wales. Many finds from the Bronze Age have sun motifs. Major ritual sites like Stonehenge and Seahenge are aligned according to the position of the sun on Midsummer's Day — proof of the astronomical knowledge and accurate observation skills people had in the Bronze Age.
Image: Alastair Grant/AP Photo/picture alliance
Gold necklace — 800-700 B.C.
This necklace was found in Ireland, which also has impressive prehistoric and early historic sites, including Newgrange, a ritual site aligned with the position of the sun on Midsummer's Day. "The World of Stonehenge" exhibition at the British Museum showcases treasures from the Bronze Age from February 17 to July 17, 2022.