1. Skip to content
  2. Skip to main menu
  3. Skip to more DW sites

US judge rules Trump unlawfully canceled Harvard's grants

Dmytro Hubenko with AP, AFP, Reuters
September 3, 2025

Harvard has scored a legal victory against the White House as a federal judge overturned the Trump administration's decision to cut the university's funding by billions of dollars.

Students walk on the campus of Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US
Harvard University is one of the most famous and prestigious colleges in the worldImage: Faith Ninivaggi/REUTERS

A federal judge in Boston ruled on Wednesday that US President Donald Trump's administration had unlawfully terminated more than $2 billion (€1.7 billion) in grants awarded to Harvard University and could no longer cut off the university's research funding.

US District Judge Allison Burroughs ruled in favor of the Ivy League school, deciding that the cuts were illegal retaliation for Harvard's rejection of the White House's demands for changes to its governance and policies.

The ruling is a significant victory for Harvard in its battle with the Trump administration, which has also sought to prevent the school from hosting foreign students and threatened to revoke its tax-exempt status.

The judge's order reinstates all of Harvard's federal funding that was frozen or cut since April 14. The order also prohibits the government from making future cuts that violate Harvard's constitutional rights or federal law.

It remains to be seen whether Harvard will actually receive the money. If the ruling stands, it will revive the university's extensive research operation and hundreds of projects that lost federal funding.

How Trump's intimidation tactics affect Harvard students

03:20

This browser does not support the video element.

What did the judge say in the Harvard ruling?

The Trump administration had tied the freezes at Harvard to delays in addressing antisemitism on campus. However, the judge said the federally funded research had little connection to antisemitism.

Burroughs said the evidence she had seen suggested that Trump "used antisemitism as a smokescreen for a targeted, ideologically-motivated assault on this country's premier universities."
      
"It is clear, even based solely on Harvard's own admissions, that Harvard has been plagued by antisemitism in recent years and could (and should) have done a better job of dealing with the issue," she wrote. 

However, the judge stressed that there is "little connection between the research affected by the grant terminations and antisemitism."

Judge blocks Harvard foreign student ban

02:44

This browser does not support the video element.

Conflict between Trump and Harvard

Trump and his allies claim that Harvard and other prestigious universities are unaccountable bastions of liberal, anti-conservative bias and antisemitism. They make these claims particularly surrounding protests against Israel's war in Gaza.

Trump launched his campaign against the top universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of their curricula, staffing, student recruitment, and "viewpoint diversity."

The government has also targeted Harvard's ability to host international students, an important source of income, accounting for 27% of total enrollment in the 2024–25 academic year.

Although Harvard has begun funding some of its own research, the university has warned that it cannot absorb the full cost of federal cuts.

Edited by: Wesley Dockery

Dmytro Hubenko Dmytro covers stories in DW's newsroom from around the world with a particular focus on Ukraine.
Skip next section Explore more
Skip next section DW's Top Story

DW's Top Story

Skip next section More stories from DW