Why Not an EU Medal Tally?
September 3, 2004
The United States competes as a bloc -- athletes from 50 different states join together under one flag. What would happen if the same applied to Olympians from the European Union, if athletes from the 25 member states all competed under the starry banner of the EU?
In terms of medal counts, EU member states would stand to profit greatly in the ranking if they were taken as a whole. No longer would they be regulated to mid-field in the tallying of gold medals. Germany, France, Great Britain and Italy would not have to be content playing third-string to the US, China and Australia. Poland, Hungary and the Netherlands would suddenly find themselves counted among the top 10 athletic nations instead of the top 20. And small countries like Luxembourg and Malta would be able to boast about gold medal athletes.
If the EU were taken as a bloc and not divided up into 25 different countries, it would clearly dominate the gold medals list. Already four of the top 10 countries are European: Germany, France, Italy and Great Britain. Several others are in the top 20: Netherlands, Greece, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. And a dozen more wait in the wings with silver and bronze.
At the end of the ninth day of competition, the EU would have more than 45 gold medals compared to the 21 from China and the 20 from the United States. Is there any more compelling reason to count the 25 nations as one bloc?
Unification and integration
Second, fans would be inspired to cheer for more than just their own national sports heroes. Media coverage of the Games would be less nationalistic, including more than just local favorites, and might even draw attention to interesting, Olympic participants, who otherwise slip through the cracks in regional broadcasts.
Ultimately, the Games could encourage a sense of pan-European patriotism more in tune with the spirit of the Olympics -- being there is everything.